11 Best Conservative News Sites in 2022 (A Personal List)

Originally posted on September 12, 2022 @ 3:37 pm

However, reliable, fact-based information is often difficult to get across, in contrast to the abundance of conservative content. There are certain postings that do nothing except grab your attention, and there are others that actually teach you something. We suggest the following sites as the finest places to go in 2022 for up-to-date conservative news information.

National Review

When looking to learn more about international policy, National Review remains one of the greatest sources for conservative news and opinions. Subscribe to newsletters like Morning Jolt, written by Political Correspondent Jim Geraghty, or Jack Crowe’s News Editor’s Roundup, written by Jack Crowe, to keep up to speed.

Washington’s free beacon

The Washington Free Beacon, which was launched in 2012, provides a wide range of fresh material, including distinctive investigative journalism and incisive satire. The information and entertainment it provides is always welcome, but readers should keep in mind that the media is rarely objective.

The Federalist

Culture, politics, and religion are intertwined throughout The Federalist. They come up with original content that is more analytical than the typical news site while yet adhering to the conservative ethos. If you like reading both the main story and the rebuttal, you may like The Federalist.

The Washington Examiner

There is a conservative news website and weekly magazine in the nation’s capital called The Washington Examiner. Clarity Media Group, controlled by Philip Anschutz, has a subsidiary called MediaDC.

The American Thinker

In spite of its lack of glitzy visuals, streaming video, and other multimedia invasion tactics, the American Thinker blog is a treasure trove of conservative commentary. Articles written by Americans who have extraordinary political experiences, an opinion, and access to a keyboard are published in American Thinker and can’t be found anywhere else. There is a call to action in this post for readers to share their own experiences and perspectives.


Multimedia celebrity Glenn Beck runs the news magazine–style website TheBlaze, where he posts original articles, opinion, and even films. This piece is proud to be both reasonable and patriotic.


RedState, founded by Erik Erickson, is a blog and news source that features original and conservative commentary written in an accessible blog format. The well-known group has an annual conference where politicians and would-be presidential contenders try to win over conservative voters.

PJ Media

PJ Media is a platform for influential bloggers and columnists to share their thoughts with the world. One of PJ Media’s stated missions is to “defend, protect, and maintain what it did and will continue to do to make America great.”


Twitchy, created in 2012 by Michelle Malkin, finds and features breaking news and stories on Twitter, as well as the greatest conservative comments on such stories. The site’s content manages to be both informative and fun. If you’re interested in hearing conservative perspectives on breaking news before it gets mainstream, Twitchy will satisfy all your excitement needs in 280 characters or fewer.


If you’re interested in reading up on the latest developments in the pro-life movement, LifeSiteNews.com is a great resource. At LifeSiteNews.com, you may read news and opinions on a variety of topics, including those related to the home, faith, and civil rights. This piece has gained notoriety for its discussion of controversial topics like abortion, euthanasia, stem cell research, and bioethics. Providing “a more balanced and factual coverage of the community, life, and family matters” is one of the stated missions of the website. The stories are updated every day, and so are the newsletters.

The Factual combed through 58,000 pieces of writing published between May 1, 2020 and May 21, 2020 to determine the most reliable right-leaning publications that published at least six times (or twice weekly) within that time frame. Below is a list of the top ten periodicals as determined by their average credibility grade from Factual.

Conservative news sites keep a close eye on you

One study found that right-wing platforms planted 73% more browser cookies than left-wing platforms.

In this era of extreme partisanship, more and more Americans are getting their news from sites that share their political beliefs. The Internet’s right and left-leaning communities are not simply divided by their political beliefs. One article claims that conservative outlets in the widely dispersed online news industry monitor their readers’ behaviour even more closely than their liberal counterparts.

Does leaning left or right affect how you spot fake news?

The growth of politically-charged false news on social media has recently drawn a lot of attention and sparked some legitimate concerns about its potential impact on society. When influential people propagate false information, it can have far-reaching consequences.

After US President Donald Trump’s March 29 tweet falsely claimed that Amazon was not paying taxes to state and local governments and was generating a large loss for the US Postal Service, Amazon’s stock dropped nearly 8% in two days before recovering after a White House spokesman said “no action was contemplated.” The impact of fake news extends far beyond the electoral process and into virtually every facet of modern life.

Fields impacted by disinformation

  • Online Marketing
  • Gambling domain
  • Entertainment
  • Media news

Each website in the cyber world has its own disclaimer. This provision is a legally enforceable agreement between the company and the customer who is making use of the services. If a user violates the site’s rules regarding the dissemination of false information, the service provider may terminate or suspend the user’s account. In the gaming industry, for instance, there is a set of rules designed to discourage dishonest play. To understand these terms and conditions, a customer must be able to read them.

Implicit or explicit bias toward confirming one’s own hypotheses

Exactly why do some people believe false stories? It has been established through research that people are susceptible to a phenomenon called “confirmation bias,” where they give more credence to information and explanations that fit in with their preexisting beliefs about a topic, regardless of how reliable those beliefs may be.

Is this bias shared by those who identify with different political ideologies, or does it vary by those who identify as conservative or progressive?

The following questions were attempted to be answered in a recent study conducted at IESE that is now under review for publication. Does one’s political leaning influence one’s ability to spot fake news from the real thing? Could the political leaning of the news have an effect on this skill?

Researchers have looked at how tweets propagate news in the past. Sinan Aral and his colleagues at MIT conducted a study analysing 126,000 tweet threads and found that fake news gets to 10 retweets 20 times faster than authentic news.

It is not possible, given the parameters of this study, to investigate whether or not individuals’ political leanings or familiarity with the news’ political bias play a role.

In order to investigate this, we presented 40 headlines with images and captions to a sample of 444 participants, as seen in the figure below.

Out of those 40 news stories, 20 preferred conservative views and the other 20 favoured liberal views (in the US context, liberal is equivalent to a Democratic-progressive voter). Ten of the headlines were accurate, and ten were not. Multiple credible media outlets carried the exact headlines. The researchers observed that the phoney news set they used was lifted straight from troll/satirical sites that manufacture bogus stories.

Subjectively, each participant ranked themselves on a scale from 1 (extremely liberal) to 10 (highly conservative) and evaluated the veracity of each of the 40 tales from 1 (certainly untrue) to 10 (very true) (definitely true).

We defined accuracy as the degree to which a rating was within +1 standard deviation of its “actual” value of 1, and we analysed the correlation between political leanings and a propensity to trust fake news or to disbelieve true news (for false). or 10 (for true).

To give an example, if the responder supplied an exact 1 for fake news and an exact 10 for real news, we would call that a precision of 10.

We were able to examine how accurate people were based on their affinity to each news item because each responder also rated themselves on a scale from 1 to 10 according to their political perspective, giving us an affinity rating for each of the 40 questions.

Consistent with earlier research, we provide irrefutable evidence that people will accept as true any news that supports an ideology they already hold.

Another finding of our study is that people are better able to distinguish between truthful and false news when it is located at a great distance from them.

When comparing the average precisions of people with different political leanings, we find a statistically significant difference, with liberals having a higher accuracy for all news than their conservative counterparts, with the disparity being larger for actual news than for fake news.

For the benefit of those who believe fake news

That is, a higher percentage of self-proclaimed conservatives are inaccurate (they trust false news and don’t believe actual news) than liberals are. Our findings challenge the findings of other research that found no difference between liberals and conservatives, suggesting that the gap between the two groups may be larger than previously thought.

There are research in the field of psychology that link belief in fake news to rigid beliefs and a lack of critical thinking.

At the same time, a study from the field of political science reveals that Trump supporters in the United States are more likely to be cognitively inflexible, dogmatic, and intolerant of ambiguity than liberals (self-defined as pro-Clinton voters).

It appears that our data supports the hypothesis that liberals’ superior capacity to distinguish between fact and fiction stems directly from their lower levels of dogmatism and greater willingness to examine their own ideas.

Finally, it’s important to state the obvious: we make no value judgments about people’s beliefs or conduct experiments designed to determine whether or not such beliefs affect people’s voting behaviour. To put it simply, we argue that our sample reveals a disparity in how well conservatives and liberals can distinguish fake news from the actual thing.

Concluding Remarks

To help you make better decisions regarding things like masks, vaccines, and what to do in the voting booth, we’ve compiled a list of outstanding conservative news outlets from across the political spectrum. Many current news themes are complicated, so it’s important to explore perspectives that align with and differ from your own. The world needs readers like you to help find common ground in this time of division.


Parag Banerjee is an experienced Search Engine Optimizer. He has a wide knowledge of Google Updates, Analytics, and many others. He studied Computer Application from Techno India.

Articles: 317